Close Search Close

 

  • Comics
  • Theatre
  • Site News

I see: Aggressive nonsensicality in Pinky and the Brain

A reference outside the expected frame of reference that stares you in the face, demanding you deal with it

The classic Warner Brothers cartoons of the 1930s and 40s were full of pop culture references, so it’s no surprise that in the 90s the Warner Brothers — and their sister, Dot — drew from a broad base of sources for Animaniacs. But those old shorts were theatrical releases that screened for adults and children alike, while the afternoon-aired Animaniacs was clearly marketed to children. And that makes its allusions and homages and outright rip-offs of adult-focused entertainment even odder. The show wrung a recurring short out of a bird-based parody of Goodfellas, a movie that presumably very few 10-year-olds had seen. But “little guy losing his shit” is a classic cartoon conceit, so porting a furious Joe Pesci into a pigeon still works on a basic level of entertainment.

The show’s breakout segment, though, was original. Pinky and the Brain follows two mice (guess their names) as they try to take over the world with elaborate schemes and come surprisingly close before failing every time. Maurice LaMarche’s Brain owes a debt to Orson Welles in grandiosity but is more of a straight man than Welles could stand to be, and Rob Paulsen’s Pinky is a daffy delight, whose devotion to his friend is only surpassed by his ability to fuck things up. In short order the pair had their own TV show on the WB, which we did not get on our extremely basic cable setup, and I was getting a little too old for cartoons anyway. These days I still don’t have cable but I have Tubi, which recently landed the full run of Pinky And The Brain, and it’s become a wind-down show.

The show pulls from all areas of culture, including reality — one episode is based around the 1996 presidential election — but it also runs to very specific parody far more than I remembered happening in Animaniacs. But would I have remembered that anyway? Because a lot of this material is, like Goodfellas, well outside the typical pre-teen purview. LaMarche’s Wellesian riffs are given the canvas of a full parody of The Third Man, complete with black and white cinematography and zither score, and if no children are poisoned the Brain gets to deliver a hilarious inversion of the cuckoo clock monologue. Watching it as an adult is a gas, but the episode makes sure to include plenty of physical comedy along with the homage. A young viewer would clearly sense something is afoot here but can still laugh along. Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd turned opera into comedy, after all — post-war noir is just as sound a structure for play.

As is the kaiju flick, and the most recent episode I watched placed our heroes in 1950s Japan, where they plan to reverse engineer a shrinking ray to become monstrous; Pinky will impersonate Godzilla and let the Brain vanquish him, resulting in adulation and world dominance (this is par for the course for the pair’s plans in terms of convolution). Obviously the real Godzilla (or at least the Legally Distinct Parody Gollyzilla) will show up, what I was not expecting were multiple cuts every few minutes to a square-jawed man on a clearly separate set, grimly intoning “I see.” This is of course Legally Not Raymond Burr, the American inserted into the original Godzilla, and maybe some of the kids who were watching Tommy DeVito bludgeon Billy Batts to death were also watching that flick. But I’m guessing for most young viewers the deadpan reference did not play as a riff on an archetype or a style or performance, but as a total non sequitur. 

The WB execs wanted Pinky and the Brain to compete with The Simpsons for their audience of kids and adults, but while The Simpsons was an even thicker stew of references that very density usually absorbed the real weird stuff into the background — thinking of something like the candy convention page system “looking for Mr. Goodbar,” which is a background gag that still scans as a goof on a funny name if you don’t know the (extremely dark) allusion to the 1970s movie. Or how “Itchy & Scratchy Land” is a direct riff on Westworld but also works just fine on its own, “killer robots attack” is a fine plot for any show. And ultimately I should’ve realized the writers of “Tokyo Grows” (Gordon Bressack and Charles M. Howell IV, and how is that title for another kid-unfriendly reference?) had a plan for this intrusion. 

Eventually the shrinking-turned-growing ray is knocked loose and it embiggens Burr himself, who throws down with Godzilla in a final battle. The stray reference is once again folded into the larger work and it is indeed very funny to see a giant Raymond Burr fighting an equally large lizard. But even without that, I just appreciate the audacity of deploying something so blatantly weird, a reference outside the expected frame of reference that stares you in the face, demanding you deal with it. It’s a show that is not just funny but having fun, and that is especially pleasurable to see in a landscape of Surf Draculas deep in boring lore and low on hijinks. And I think it’s fun for those younger viewers as well, and perhaps instructive in its own way: Art will do what it wants, and that might not be something you’re expecting. 

So that’s what I’ve been watching on TV. What about you?