Anthologized
You know what? This show has great episode titles.
Opening: Portrait of a man at work, the only work he’s ever done, the only work he knows. His name is Henry Francis Valentine, but he calls himself “Rocky”, because that’s the way his life has been โ rocky and perilous and uphill at a dead run all the way. He’s tired now, tired of running or wanting, of waiting for the breaks that come to others but never to him, never to Rocky Valentine. โฆ A scared, angry little man. He thinks it’s all over now, but he’s wrong. For Rocky Valentine, it’s just the beginning.
โA Nice Place to Visit,โ like โI Shot an Arrow Into the Air,โ is an episode that mostly just spins its wheels waiting for its plot-defining twist, but it offers the viewer a pretty good time in the process. For me, it never rises above solid funโthereโs a (much) more problematic but also more thoughtful spin on the same theme a few episodes from now, in โThe Chaserโโso itโs somewhat slight, but itโs well-executed, has a reasonable core concept, and fits comfortably somewhere in the middle of the Twilight Zone pack.
This isnโt an out-and-out comedy episode, but it feels as much like one as any story of eternal damnation could. The structure is that of a joke, complete with a (literal) hell of a punchline. Rockyโs desires are mostly played for laughs, with the episode repeatedly emphasizing that heโs not just meanspirited, acquisitive, and violent, heโs also just a crass guy with cheap tastes, someone whose โheavenlyโ apartment comes with ribbed satin walls, pin-up oil paintings, and loud checked suits.
Thereโs a conflation of morals, class, and taste here that Iโm not wild about, but it feels of a piece with the episodeโs determinedly light tone. We have to not mind the fact that Rocky Valentine is condemned to hell, and so โA Nice Place to Visitโ tries very hard to avoid giving him any redeeming characteristicsโeven anything neutral like refined or homey tastes or a liking for natural beauty (aside from beautiful women).
Rocky Valentine (Larry Blyden1) does have plenty of authentically awful traits. He commits very thoroughly to calling Pip (Sebastian Cabot2) โfatsโ or โfatso,โ he unhesitatingly tries to rob at gunpoint someone who seems to only be helping him, he wins forty grand in an hour and isnโt too flushed with the thrill of victory to forget to warn one of his โstacked broadsโ not to steal from him, andโeven before he knows that everyone else in this world is a prop rather than a personโhe gleefully bullies the street cop that Pip humorously shrinks down for his entertainment. (To be fair, one did shoot him. I’d probably hold a grudge too.) Heโs a jerk, and his biggest pleasure in lifeโone that becomes bitter in deathโis winning. The endless parade of beautiful young women he summons up arenโt even really there for enjoyable sex, theyโre there to flatter his ego, to give him the rush of โbeing a big man with a chick.โ
Rockyโs moral good points may be nil, but he does have one classically dramatic virtue, and thatโs the fact that he has a surprising amount of self-awareness. When he looks back at his life, he knows heโs looking back at a long stretch of self-interested, petty criminality; when he tries to figure out why heโs in heaven, all he can think is that he must have done something really good once, but heโs damned if he can remember what. (Okay, Iโm going to stop these puns now.) Heโs genuinely curious about the explanation here, enough that he seeks out the Hall of Records to look up the file they have on his life.
Naturally, it starts with: โAge of six, slaughtered a small dog.โ The fact that it then goes to a minor convenience store robbery is kind of (unintentionally?) hilarious; itโs a real de-escalation on child Rockyโs part. I canโt emphasize enough how much Iโd prefer people steal rather than slaughter small dogs.
It only takes three entries before Rocky realizes that this is not encouraging reading and thereโs probably not any heavenly behavior forthcoming. In general, I find Larry Blydenโs performance as Rocky fine but unremarkable, but heโs very good at showing how baffled and unnerved Rocky is by all this.
Before we get to the ultimate payoff, I should mention that the intro and outro to this episode are jarring in relation to the rest of it. Rocky is a deeply unpleasant person, but the introโwhich feels more like Serling than Beaumont, oddly enoughโpaints him with some degree of compassion. It emphasizes Rockyโs fear and exhaustion and lucklessness, not his vindictiveness and casual cruelty. It doesnโt make it sound as though Rockyโs โrockyโ life is his own fault or a flaw of his perception, even when it would take just a simple tweakโfrom thatโs the way his life has been to thatโs the way he thinks his life has beenโto remove that hint of genuine narrative pity.
Compare it to the intro to โWhat You Need,โ which positions Fred Renard in a similar light but also emphasizes his sourness and the chip on his shoulder, the โEscape Clauseโ intro that perfectly captures Walter Bedekerโs abiding narcissism, or the savagery of Arch Hammerโs introduction in โThe Four of Us Are Dying.โ Those episodes do a better job of gearing you for their erstwhile protagonistโs narrative comeuppance. Rockyโs could just as easily be positioning him for a redemption arc. Itโs not a major flaw, but itโs odd, and itโs even odder when we get to the closing narration, which once again invokes the introโs portrayal of Rocky and then is like, โWell, now heโs damned for all eternity. See you next week, folks.โ
On the bright side, as far as hells go, Rockyโs honestly isnโt too bad. He just needs to develop some interests that arenโt as likely to lose their luster through rigged repetitions. You know what, Rocky? Nowโs a great time to learn a foreign language. Or travel. Or pick up a book. (Of course, I guess if his luck is really that rocky, the setup of his afterlife could change the instant he starts coping with it better.)
And now the punchline, one made even more famous via The Good Place3, which even has the same โformerly helpful afterlife figure bursts into evil laughter after the revelation that the protagonist isnโt in heaven after all.โ
A month of non-stop, effortless victories at the tables and the slots have made those thrills go stale, even though Rocky continues to plug away at them with more and more resignation and resentment. He even plays cards with the women in his apartmentโwhich is how we find out that other pleasures, too, have lost their charm. Thereโs a weird pathos to how cheered Rocky is by the sudden manifestation of a pool table and then how dispirited he is when his break instantly sends all the balls careening into their pockets. Itโs a brief but very effective illustration of exactly why what would be cool once is utterly joyless in the long run.
His last scene with Pip is a good one, with one of his best linesโโWhen you win every time, thatโs not gambling, itโs charity!โโand a brief, fun detour into the prospect of planning a bank robbery like itโs an escape room. It says a lot about how run down Rocky is by โheavenโ that heโs outright asking to go to hell because he suspects heโd be happier there โฆ and Pipโs reaction is the glorious height of Sebastian Cabotโs performance in this episode: โHeaven? Whatever gave you the idea that you were in heaven, Mr. Valentine? This is the other place!โ
We end with Pip laughing uproariously as Rocky tries the doorknob to no avail, stuck forever in his gilded cage. Thereโs sometimes a fine line between humor and horror, and this ending works by planting itself right on that narrow divide. Thereโs not much more to it than the joke, but at least the (mean) joke is a pretty funny one.
Closing: A scared, angry little man who never got a break. Now he has everything he’s ever wanted โ and he’s going to have to live with it for eternity โ in The Twilight Zone.
Directed by: John Brahm
Written by: Charles Beaumont
Up Next: “Nightmare as a Child”
About the writer
Lauren James
Lauren James is a writer who wears many different hats (and pen names). She lives in Connecticut with her wife and two cats.
Lauren Jamesโs ProfileTags for this article
More articles by Lauren James
Anthologized
A television milestone that's still bittersweet and powerful.
Streaming Shuffle
Hold, please.
Department of
Conversation
I wonder if I’d have seen the twist coming so early without The Good Place? I feel like this episode is a bit too obvious about the setup for the twist to really land but I’m sure it fared at least a little better at the time.
Generally enjoyed the performances and the odd vibe of the hall of records but this one is definitely getting filed under “fun but forgettable”.
I think this is a real “the one where” episode: The One Where the Guy Finds Out He’s in Hell. Succinct, so it’s easy to remember what happens, but there’s also not much there there.
The performances carry this one. It’s not bad, but it’s not really much either. Rocky seems cursed with a lack of imagination since he could have tried to think of new pleasures, at least different women (though it’s not like we were going to really see much done with that here).
Michael Schur is one of 32,000 writers and directors quoted in Alan Sepinwall’s new book, which I got my hands on via the library last week. I am up to the chapter about Night Gallery. So far, it’s a very good and well written bio of Serling that leans heavily into Sepinwall’s impressive industry connections and his deep love of all things Serling. But reading this reveals there are actually quite a few other Serling bios (never mind all the stuff written about Twilight Zone), and I wonder if maybe I would have been better off reading a book by someone who’s not quite so in love with our subject. Sepinwall doesn’t think everything Serling does is perfect, but he’s way too kind about some of TZ’s flaws and more so about Serling’s movie work. (Serling was not a visual writer, Sepinwall admits, but can’t quite see that movies, unlike early TV, are far more visually driven and that might be why our man never really made it on the big screen.) There’s also so much love from all these big names that it gets to be an echo chamber. Surely someone in Hollywood likes but doesn’t love Serling.
And there is a small but surprising error. Sepinwall, in addressing the twists TZ is famous for, states that audiences didn’t encounter twists too often in movies and even less often on TV. We here know of a TV show that predates TZ and relied about as much on twists, one that had as its host someone even more influential than Serling. And yet there is no mention anywhere in the book of Alfred Hitchcock Presents. I am rather shocked, to be honest. I sent a note to Sepinwall pointing this out, but so far no reply. I hope I am not the only one to make this note.
I have Sepinwall’s bio but haven’t gotten around to it yet, to my shame. But I really enjoyed Anne Serling’s memoir of her father. Unsurprisingly, it’s very affectionate, so you wouldn’t necessarily get the more clear-eyed approach you mention here, but the deeply felt personal warmth (and still-vivid sense of grief) changes the tenor of things.
Very surprised AHP doesn’t come up! That does seem like a surprising omission, particularly since I know I’d have to bring up “The Case of Mr. Pelham” when discussing “Mirror Image” and the show in general when discussing the later episode “The Silence,” which feels as much like an AHP episode as “Pelham” feels like a TZ episode.