Rogue One is two stories, or maybe three.
Onscreen, it’s the story of flawed heroes: finding a shot at redemption, looking for a second chance, finding hope in the darkest moments.
Offscreen, it’s the story of a troubled production that managed to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat; it’s also the story of a successful movie that taught executives all the wrong lessons.
This dark little gem of a movie made over a billion dollars on a (probably) $280 million budget.1 Not too shabby, especially considering it started its life as a TV script and got retooled behind the scenes after being developed as a feature film during production.2 (You may recall that one of the more memorable lines from the teaser trailer was cut: “I rebel,” Jyn Erso says in that teaser, and never again.) This was the first, and possibly last, troubled production that Lucasfilm managed to parley into success, and it’s worth taking a closer look at the why.
Here are some lessons Lucasfilm and Disney appear to have taken from Rogue One:
I don’t think you need me to tell you that not all of these lessons were, perhaps, the right ones.
The decision to hold on to release dates no matter what was probably the worst takeaway, but the idea that every fucking little thing needs explaining is also a strong contender.. No one even really needed to learn there was a defect deliberately built into the Death Star; that’s just a good detail to hang a story on. Remember story hooks? Let’s bring those back.
Here are some lessons they could have taken away:
To be fair, the extremely divided reception that The Last Jedi would receive just a year later probably meant that last lesson was never going to be internalized, but they didn’t have to go quite so far as The Rise of Skywalker, a prime example of the futility of trying to please everyone.
The tyrants are preparing a terrible weapon, but Galen Erso knows how to stop it. He trusts his daughter to stop it. And she does.
I think a huge part of Rogue One’s success is that it’s a story, just one story. There is a beginning, a middle, and an end. Yes, the end ties directly to A New Hope, but you could watch this as your first Star Wars movie and have no further curiosity beyond ‘wow, I hope that girl at the end came out okay.’ It’s got more in common with The Magnificent Seven/Seven Samurai than The Empire Strikes Back: there’s a bigger world around our characters, but that’s not what the movie is about. Empire gives us a new chapter in an installment, while Rogue One ends with the final frames. The characters live (and die) within the world of the film.
This seems obvious, but it’s pretty rare for Star Wars. A New Hope was introduced with a crawl like the old-time serials George Lucas was riffing on, indicating it’s part of a larger story, neither the beginning nor end. Most of Star Wars canon has become a rat king of overlapping timelines and cameos; tie-in novels, video games, comic books, television series, throwaway copy on action figures incorporated into canon. (I find it hilarious that the Disney era definitively cut off the original Extended Universe to clarify the timeline, and then almost immediately began building a new big old mess.) Rogue One is definitely part of that giant cluster or continuity, but it nods at it. It doesn’t stop the movie dead to make sure we all learn how Han Solo got his name. Forest Whitaker’s Saw Gerrera was in the 2012 Clone Wars cartoon, but you didn’t need to know that. Very little is set up for an ‘aah’ of recognition. The movie works without any ‘aah’ at all.
A lot of long-running canons run into this problem, trying to find the balance between a connected universe and an overstuffed universe ready to collapse under its own weight. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles reboots itself every once in a while, and the fans generally make their own Frankencanon out of whatever appeals to them. Marvel and DC comics often have little notes to the reader referring to events that took place outside of the issue at hand. Sony did…what it did, and the MCU is struggling with balance as awkwardly as Star Wars.
That makes it all the more rare and commendable that Rogue One managed it. As far as I can tell, there isn’t a ton of canon material on the Guardians of the Whills; they’re just space monks whose temple and purpose has been destroyed, and while George Lucas created a long and overcomplicated backstory for the Whills themselves4, he didn’t seem to have ever drilled down much beyond their successors. Rogue One doesn’t bother with any of that; the Guardians worked to guard the temple, the temple was destroyed, and its former protectors have been struggling with the aftermath of that loss ever since. That’s all you really need to know. It’s not overexplained, and it doesn’t need to be. The actors do the work to establish the characters and their dynamics, and the script gives them time — not a lot, but enough — to let them work together, tease each other, fight together quite literally to the bitter end. No one gets bogged down in mythos. Andor and K-250 have a history, but the broad strokes are all we need. Bodhi Rook put his head down and did his work until he met Galen Erso, and everything changed. Orson Krennic is a power-hungry bastard working for another power-hungry bastard. Jyn Erso’s own journey and backstory has the biggest focus, but her story is also pretty streamlined:
A girl loses her family to a cruel and tyrannical government. She grows up alone, fighting to survive, in a world where morals have become a luxury. Years later, her father sends her a message: the tyrants are preparing a terrible weapon, but he knows how to stop it. He trusts her to stop it. And she does, along with a ragtag group all seeking their own redemption, or at least a little peace.
They die, but their death is not hollow. Their death brings hope.
That’s it. Beginning, middle, end.
Since Rogue One, several characters have shown up in one format or another. The Star Wars franchise has just piled on more sequels, more tie-ins, even a prequel spinoff to Rogue One itself in Andor on Disney+. I don’t think it weakens Rogue One, but I don’t think it did it any favors, either. I am terribly fond of The Guardians of the Whills tie-in novel5, but if it hadn’t been cheap on Amazon that one time, I wouldn’t have read it, and I would have been fine.
Looking back from almost a decade later, it seems like even more of a small miracle that Rogue One made it to screen, much less that it was the commercial and artistic success that it was. Like the rebels themselves, the movie managed to beat the odds…but the cost was pretty heartbreaking.
So it goes.
About the writer
Bridgett Taylor
Bridgett Taylor has a day job, but would rather talk about comic books. She lives in small-town Vermont (she has met Bernie; she has not met Noah Kahan), where she ushers at local theatrical productions and talks too much at Town Meeting.
Bridgett Taylor’s ProfileTags for this article
More articles by Bridgett Taylor
"You're so normal, you're weird."
Year of the Month
Eroticism and suffering entwine in Mishima's second novel.
Intersectional Femivision
What's wrong with looking at something pretty? It depends on who you ask.
In Memoriam
Ted Nichols taught countless kids the sound of a punchline.
Year of the Month
Action, adventure, and eye candy in several senses of the word.
Department of
Conversation
Great write-up of what quickly became one of my favorite Star Wars movies. (And good call on how nice it is to have Baze/Chirrut semi-canonized, when the forums I wrote SW fic on back in middle school wouldn’t allow even G-rated slash, ostensibly out of fear of Lucasfilms retaliating.) I especially love your point about how well this works as a self-contained story in a larger world–it gives you the SFnal pleasures of a world full of intriguing, imaginative gaps to be filled in, but it also has a story. It’s more a movie than a segment of mythology, which is something the franchise has always waffled back and forth between.
Also I just love Jyn.
Jyn is great. They’re all great. Even K-250, who might be incredibly annoying under other circumstances, is great. But yeah, she has a really wonderful story.
(Even Donnie Yen was like ‘oh, yeah, I can see that.’ Amazing.)
I really like this look at the movie as a “troubled production” with visible seams (and man, I hated that smug “I rebel” line in the trailer, was glad to see it gone). That’s a lot of movies, right? And sometimes they fail, but sometimes you get a Casablanca; if Rogue One isn’t at that level — the movie is quite sloppy in the first two acts — it’s still a success. You talk about the various ways these massive enterprises have collapsed under their own weight and perhaps part of the trouble is trying to avoid trouble in the larger plan without caring what that means for the actual, you know, movies that make it up. Something about squeezing tight and sand slipping through fingers comes to mind.
And for me, the present absence that is most compelling regarding Chirrut and Baze is the Force itself. It is not something that exists and can be engaged with clumsily or masterfully, but pure belief, aka religion. Considering the relative amount of non-Jedi/Sith in the universe, this is an aspect that seems incredibly undeveloped and I really like Chirrut’s use of it as meditative belief. And Baze accepts this because he loves Chirrut, not out of any belief of his own, that is the connection that matters to him.
As I said, I like “I rebel,” but I think it’s the kind of line that can sound good in a trailer and then become smug and plodding in the actual movie. (Since we’re talking about Greg Rucka, I absolutely understand why he insisted that the “this man is more to me than you can dream” monologue in The Old Guard remain intact, but it reads a lot better on the page than it flows in a scene.)
When Baze starts the mantra after Chirrut falls…that gets me every damn time. He may not believe in the Force, but he believes in Chirrut.