Close Search Close

 

  • Comics
  • Theatre
  • Site News

Year of the Month

𝜋

Where's the pattern? Where is God in the numbers?

𝜋 is the work of a failed conspiracy theorist. Obviously, there are much worse things to be than that – most conspiracy theorists, like most dictators, are actually failed artists, regardless of whatever job they consciously pursued. In this film, Maximilian Cohen (Sean Gullette)is a neurotic, alienated, lonely young man obsessively trying to find the ultimate pattern he believes is present in mathematics. The plot of the film is, essentially, that he finds it – the true name of God as represented by a 216-digit number. This works as a simple framework to hold up a display of emotion.

Co-writer/director Darren Aronovsky works his Jewish heritage into the story; Maximilian is Jewish, and his search for the true pattern embroils him in a hidden society of Hassidic Jews. If the movie were concerned with the practical reality of conspiracy theories, it would be about antisemites (most real-life conspiracies end up coming back to Jewish people in one form or another). Ironically, by focusing so tightly on one aspect of Jewish culture, Aronovsky makes the film more universal; undistracted by racism, we can focus on the basic principle of trying to make patterns out of a confusing universe.

Maximilian is young and angry – distinct from old and angry. Gullette plays him as constantly twitchy; bursting with an unfocused energy and reacting to everything, even when that reaction isn’t spoken. I like that the movie plays him as consistently afraid of everyone; he only mentions being a private person once, but he’s hesitant and nervous around everyone, even openly friendly people like Lenny (Ben Shenkman). Conspiracy theories are the illusion of control; conspiracy theorists are defined, psychologically, by a desire to feel powerful, or more accurately a fear of feeling weak. Certainly, I’m frequently disappointed by real-life conspiracy theorists when I ask them what their ultimate goal is and they tell me “For everybody to know.” When I ask them what they hope to actually do that they can’t do, I get the rhetorical equivalent of blank stares.

Maximilian’s desire to know – to find a pattern for the universe – is really a desire to have an organised inner life. The thing about crazy beliefs is that they really do make it easier to make decisions; astrology, for example, is really a mystic psychology to make it easier to react to someone acting brashly, or at least to find a way to forgive them as you live in the same world. I understand that ritualistic behaviour is very good at giving one a sense of control over the world, even when you don’t believe in the ritual itself. With no inner locus of control, Maximilian looks for external expressions; he becomes infuriated when he discovers his mentor Sol (Mark Margolis) is at least a little full of shit, just trying to be comfortable in the world, and as the movie goes on, his violent actions and poor temper come off as a way of asserting control.

If the movie has a fault – and this is a fault that comes from the creators being too young to tell the story they’re trying to tell – it’s that it falls just short of really interrogating Maximilian. One of the extraordinary things about revisiting it is seeing how great the performances are; how grounded and human the people around him are, and how this sells that these people have lives and histories outside Maximilian – that the world exists outside his own head and neurotic obsessions. Its failure is that it doesn’t quite get to how Maximilian can live in that world with them.

This doesn’t undermine the aesthetic qualities of the film. If its purpose is to show, cinematically, the emotional experience of being a conspiracy theorist, it achieves that above and beyond. Neuroticism is a difficult emotion to convey in cinema simply because most people don’t want to be neurotic. Power is incredibly easy, being a feeling you can get drunk on; realistically, neuroticism is something where you really have to work to make it cool. For Aranovsky, this is done through fast montage; most notably, the repetition of Maximilian taking his pills, something he’d come back to Requiem for a Dream.

Want to support more great writing like this? Get exclusive member benefits like access to our Discord, early access to Media Magpies content, and more by joining our Patreon!