Anthologized
Not the story you're expecting. (But also: barely a story at all.)
Claude Rainsโs genteel melancholy elevates almost any material; Charles Bronson has a visceral, gritty force of personality. Ray Bradbury wrote some classics. Robert Stevenson was a strong journeyman director with a gift for quirky material.
I donโt know how they all added up to โAnd So Died Riabouchinska.โ This probably isnโt weaker than โShopping for Deathโ or โThe Derelictsโโwe are not in a good stretch hereโbut the middling use of all this talent makes it more of a disappointment.
Rains stars as John Fabian, a highly successful ventriloquist with years of top billing at a thriving theater.1 His dummy is the elegant Riabouchinska (voiced by a returning Virginia Gregg). Usually, ventriloquists are comedians, but while we only see the close of Fabianโs act, itโs a sickly sweet, self-aggrandizing bit where Riabouchinska coosโat his requestโthat heโs the best ventriloquist in the world and she loves him. People pay for this? Are they simply impressed that heโs able to throw a feminine, Russian-accented voice?
A dead juggler in the theaterโs basement brings in Charles Bronson as Detective Krovitch, a man willing to do hours of research to chase down the smallest and most meaningless of details, almost all of which seem, at times, peripheral to the murder heโs trying to solve.2 The juggler, Ockham, used to hang around asking after Fabian, who never wanted to see him, and following this legitimate lead punts Krovitch down the rabbit hole.
There may be normal ventriloquists in real life, but Iโm not sure Iโve ever met one in fiction. โAnd So Died Riabouchinskaโ quickly and ably establishes that I certainly wonโt find one here: one of the best, most casually human scenes is the opening, where Iris Adrianโs Macey and Harry Tylerโs Dan Silver chat about gambling and confession magazines before deciding to flip Irisโs new โluckyโ coin. The coin lands on the corpse, but even before that, the relaxed working theater vibe of the scene is disrupted, at least for a moment, by Fabianโs arrival. He’s the story here, and he carries with him the sense of some inevitable ending.
He doesnโt fit in. Rains is not an everyman, and directors and scripts always found various ways to use that; here, his separateness marks him as (literally, in a way) carrying a secret. His characterization is textured in a way thatโs almost queer-coded: heโs the gentlemanly fellow who keeps himself a little bit apart, who has a sad and secret love that he doesnโt want revealed.
But in Fabianโs case, the love is for his dummy. It takes an actor of Rainsโs caliber to lend Fabian enough tattered grandeur that he seems tragic and deluded but not ridiculous.
Riabouchinska insists on inserting herself into Krovitchโs investigation, calling out from inside her box until Fabian produces her. (Itโs a nice detail that you can sometimes see Rainsโs lips twitching minutely on Riabouchinskaโs lines.) She reveals an affair between Fabianโs wife, Alice (an underutilized Claire Carleton) and his manager, Mel Douglas (Lowell Gilmore)โbut itโs not relevant to the plot, which sets up a pattern of similar anticlimactic turns. Thereโs almost an aristocratic world-weariness to Fabianโs domestic setup, where affairs are not embracedโthis is no happily open marriage, certainlyโbut tolerated in a jaded, emotionally empty fashion; everyone minds, but theyโve stopped caring enough to object. Itโs all too tepid to be good blackmail material, so if Fabian killed Ockham, Krovitch must look elsewhere for a motive.
That prompts him, unsurprisingly, to dig into Riabouchinska, the true love of Fabianโs life.3 (Aliceโs jealousy about this drove her into Melโs arms.) It turns out that sheโs modeled after Ilyana, Fabianโs former assistant and lover. It would be too polite and too kind to Fabian to call their romance tempestuous: it was an emotionally (and sometimes physically) abusive hell. โOnce I even burned her entire wardrobe in a fit of jealousy,โ he tells Krovitch. โShe took that quite quietly.โ Finally, he fired her for being disloyal: โI shouted at her and slapped her and pushed her out.โ But he couldnโt stand that she actually left, disappearing too thoroughly for him to ever find her again, no matter how hard he tried. He hand-carved her in the form of Riabouchinska just to bring her back again. He may love her even more now that she’s an object, though she’s a peculiarly independent one.
Until this scene, Fabian has done his best to maintain a veil of plausible deniability over his obvious sexual and romantic fixation on his dummy, but Rains lets it all loose here as he fondles Riabouchinska and strokes her face: heโs excellent at conveying a disturbing obsession that he experiences as all-encompassing rapture (โAnd the wooden body became soft and pliable and warmโ).
Bronson is no slouch in this scene either, registering tamped-down shock and horror but also, crucially, impatience. Krovitch needs this to lead somewhere. Heโs here for a mystery, not a horror story.
Krovitch gets his answers, but they fall into an odd, fuzzy middle-ground: not what he expected, but not a surprise, either. Iโll get into this more in the Twist section, but this episodeโs fondness for anticlimax and deflating misdirection weakens it; itโs fine to subvert expectations, but you have to bring freshness or power to replace that sense of narrative satisfaction, and โRiabouchinskaโ doesnโt. It has good actors, but Bronson is often trapped in provoking exposition, usually with a glower, so only Rains gets a chance to shineโand the script gives him good speeches and moments, but nothing that ever adds up to the narrative arc his talent deserves. This isn’t outright bad, but it’s all too much for too little purpose.
The Twist: Fabian killed Ockham after Ockham attempted to blackmail him over his unnatural relationship with Riabouchinska. Unfortunately for Fabian, Riabouchinska then โdecidesโ that she โcannot live with something that kills,โ and effectively shuts down; whatever inspiration or creative impulse made Fabian feel like she was distinct from him disappears, and heโs left crying out for her, looking for her as he looked for the lost Ilyana, as Krovitch leads him away.
This ending falls into the peculiar category of the anti-twist, where the shape of the story leads the audience to expect revelations that never come. In a more conventional tale, Riabouchinska would reveal that Fabian murdered Ilyana, and there would be at least a hint of the supernatural, of a real ghostly spirit animating her. Instead, while the episode encourages a viewer to pick up on the parallelsโRiabouchinska โruns away,โ just like Ilyanaโthis all feels grounded in Fabianโs delusions.
โUnconventionalโ can be a compliment. Iโm not sure it is here. This is a talky episode where the talk never leads to much: all the time spent on Ilyana only serves to provide a red herring and an overcomplicated, overcooked backstory for Fabianโs passion for Riabouchinska; all the time spent establishing Ockhamโs history with Fabian is wasted too, because almost anyone who meets Fabian can suss out within seconds that he and his dummy have been a bit too intimate. This episode has no respect for my time.
A more internal, psychological perspectiveโone TV canโt easily offerโcould better capture Fabianโs artistic experience, which is the most interesting idea here. This is not quite an unnerving dummy story like Magic, Dead of Night, or The Twilight Zoneโs โThe Dummyโ; notably, the dummy is not the problem here. Riabouchinska never kills, even as an extension of Fabianโs subconscious will. This is about romantic obsession as a drive for art, and the murder matters to the plot only because Fabian instinctively knows the character heโs created would not put up with him after it. Heโs been experiencing a free flow of inspiration, like heโs channeling something real, but now he comes to a point where he would have to be conscious that heโs forcing her into existence and making her act out-of-character. That sheโs a fictionโless kindly, a lie. On some level, no matter how much he grieves her, itโs better to let her โleave,โ to be art that is wild and outside of her artistโs control. A โdeadโ wooden body is somehow more bearable than one that was never alive to begin with.
But while those ideas are present, the episode doesnโt do much with them. Itโs not interested in Fabianโs process. Honestly, itโs not interested in muchโits focus boils down to titillating the audience with unsettling human-dummy action and producing a pat โsecond verse, same as the firstโ denouement where Ilyanaโs wooden successor also leaves Fabian. The first part isnโt creepy enough, and the second part isnโt satisfying enough. If there’s meant to be some moral closure to Fabian’s past victim escaping him yet again, even in her most seemingly controllable form, it doesn’t quite hit home. The script never makes the unseen Ilyana vivid enough for that.
Credit where credit is due, though: Claude Rains plays the hell out of the big confession scene, especially when Fabian finally speaks for himself. Few actors were ever as good at lending even their worst characters a tragic, tarnished dignity, and when Rains says, โHe was trying to spoil the only beautiful thing that was left in my life,โ it is, against all odds, moving. I may have complaints about the episode as a whole, but I certainly have none about him. He transcends the somewhat weak material and makes all this memorable through sheer, mesmerizing force.
Directed by: Robert Stevenson
Written by: Ray Bradbury (story), Mel Dinelli (teleplay)
Up Next: โSafe Conductโ
About the writer
Lauren James
Lauren James is a writer who wears many different hats (and pen names). She lives in Connecticut with her wife and two cats.
Lauren Jamesโs ProfileTags for this article
More articles by Lauren James
Anthologized
A little slice of American folklore that feels like it's been here all along.
Streaming Shuffle
You make your royal bed, and you lie in it.
Anthologized
Alone in vast space and timeless infinity: one man in a ghost town.
Streaming Shuffle
A beautiful slice-of-life film that helped make a career.
Department of
Conversation
So what exactly was going on? Was the dummy a female alter ego? Animated somehow by more than just a split personality? I don’t think this is meant to be supernatural (which is fine by me, I am tired of that trope), but this just doesn’t feel like anything real, either.
Given what he had to work with, I thought young Mr. Bronson was fine. What really just blew my mind is that the careers of Bronson (who I tend to think of as a star of the 7os even though he clearly started years before) and Rains overlapped.
The diminishing quality might just be a coefficient of the 39 episode season. You need a lot of scripts, and can’t even fall back on the characters. (Dick Van Dyke also churned out 39 episodes a season and was rarely worse for the wear despite having the same six plots to play with for five years.)
I think we have a somewhat normal ventriloquist on The Middleman but that was a regular character with a hobby. I also think that puppeteers are sometimes weird. Candace Bergen grew up thinking Charlie McCarthy was her brother, and I am very sure that Kernit was Jim Henson’s alter ego.
I lean towards the dummy being a kind of vivid fictional creation of his (if inspired by real life): you hear from authors sometimes that they feel like their characters are talking to them. (I’ve never had quite that level of it, but sometimes it does feel like channeling rather than creating.) But he boxes himself in by becoming someone he knows “she” wouldn’t tolerate. But I wish the episode had explored that more!
It is strange to see Bronson and Rains sharing the screen! I also never think of Bronson having gotten such an early start.
Oh, true on The Middleman, but good point, Noser wasn’t a pro. (Love that show.)
I actually really liked this one! A nicely strange, melancholy character piece with a couple of big-name guest stars that I wouldn’t have ever really expected to share screen time. I just saw the story as a tale of escalating madness really – the ventriloquist’s fixation on his dummy making for a compelling act until the truth of it is revealed and he topples over the edge.
The bit where we actually get to see the act was the only part that really didn’t work for me, because as you say, it doesn’t seem to have a lot going for it other than a creepy sweetness which I can’t imagine an audience turning up for even back then. But otherwise, I dug this quite a bit.
I think I would have liked it more if it had spent more time on Fabian and Riabouchinska, but shoehorning in the investigative angle took up a lot of time and didn’t pay off as well for me. Every time Rains got to pull out all the stops, though, he completely won me over.