There is nothing wrong with this episode. Itโs a serviceable little Cold War story with a decent and rather Hitchcockian hook: Mary Prescott, an American reporter on her way home from a high-profile tour of an unnamed Soviet country is, seemingly inexplicably, entrapped and denounced to the secret police. Lead actress Claire Trevorโbilled not only above the title but on a separate cardโhad an Academy Award and two more nominations under her belt. She was Dallas in Stagecoach, for crying out loud. While sheโs not at her charismatic best hereโif you encountered this in a void, you wouldnโt necessarily guess she was a bona fide movie starโsheโs not phoning it in. Her performance is low-key but effective. Sheโs fine, in short.
The whole episode is fine. Itโs never more than fine, though. It has occasional moments of interest, but no real highs. It has no real lows, either, so itโs not even bad in an interesting way. Itโs there, thatโs all. It will take you from 8:00 to 8:30 without incurring your wrath, but it will also leave you wondering, โIs that it?โ
โSafe Conductโ is at its best when Maryโa tough, intelligent womanโruns up against facets of this society that, despite all her preparation, she doesnโt understand. Trevor gives her enough pugnacity and cynicism to make it clear that sheโs no dupe: she knows her authorized tour means sheโs only seen the authorized sights. Her newspaper is being used as an instrument of propaganda, and while her gimlet-eyed perspective can undermine that somewhat, perspective only goes so far without evidence. But itโs a living, and this was a good assignment, and she accepts that. Sheโs morally solid without being a crusader. Some of that comes out through dialogue, but mostly itโs there in Trevorโs bedrock performance.
What is in the writing is that Mary still underestimates the situation. Sheโs skeptical but not suspicious, and while she can ask journalistic questions when sheโs in interview mode, sheโs not always โon.โ She accepts bureaucracy as bureaucracy, and reflexively, she expects civilized limits to it. Her world is an orderly one. In a totalitarian country, she understands that itโs good that she has a letter of safe conduct from that countryโs president, but she hasnโt thought deeply enough about what that means or about what kind of country would demand it.
Thereโs a good small instance of this early on, when Mary, organized and ready to prove that organization, asks the officials on the train if theyโre sure they donโt want to examine her letter from President Stoska. She doesnโt say it, but she thinks sheโs perceiving a weakness. This is carelessness. Itโs complacence. Theyโre too willing to accept what theyโre told.
In fact, they already know everything. โI have a copy of the letter here,โ one of the officials says.
Mary doesnโt have time to register that sheโs assumed too much, because soon theyโre pre-stamping her luggage for an easy pass through the next checkpoint (gotta give her the VIP treatment to win a favorable write-up), and sheโs meeting soccer star Jan Gubak (Jacques Bergerac).
If thereโs a major flaw in this episode, as opposed to just a whole lot of unremarkable and faintly dull virtues, itโs Bergeracโs performance as Jan. AHP must have seen something in him, since heโll be back for two more episodes; Ginger Rogers must have seen even more, since she married him. But while Trevorโs charisma feels restrained, Bergeracโs feels nonexistent. Itโs an entirely adequate portrayalโthere are no inexplicable choices, and in every scene, heโs conveying what he should be conveying. But Iโd be getting as much or more out of Trevor acting across from giant cue cards with his lines on them.
Jan and Mary chat. (This episode throws in a fair amount of Cold War seasoning, adding bits of Soviet worldbuilding that donโt affect the plot but are there to inform the realistically fucked-up atmosphere: Jan explaining that heโs forbidden to take any significant sum of money out of the country is a nice detail on that front.) Theyโre interrupted by the obnoxious Professor Klopka (Werner Klemperer), who briefly sets off Maryโs reporting instincts by claiming his country has a cure for polio it simply hasnโt decided to share yet, but never mind debunking that, back to her private compartment and the promise of a date in Munich.
Thenโsurprisingly late in the episodeโcomes the inciting incident. Jan says he desperately needs to smuggle a diamond-studded watch into Germany to pay for his sisterโs operation, and Mary, cautious but unable to resist such a sympathetic case of desperation, agrees to wear it out of the country alongside her other jewelry. Right as the plot prompts the viewer to wonder if sheโll be caught, she is โฆ because Jan instantly denounces her, claiming she showed him the watch and bragged about how she could get it through customs.
It’s a decent shock, and Mary is too busy being hurt and appalled at Jan’s viciousnessโand too busy being shuttled away to a prison-adjacent waiting area, where she can think about what kind of future lies ahead of her hereโto spend much time wondering why heโs done this. It feels like an almost motiveless burst of sadismโor, perhaps, the audience gets to think, a strange move in an immensely complicated geopolitical game played by a country where such strange moves seem routine. Mary canโt fully understand itโshe never gets the information we doโbut she was already a target: Klopka is actually Captain Kriza, a member of the secret police who is covertly taking the lead in her interrogation and detention without her even realizing it.
Klemperer, who had an impressive and long-running career on the small screen in particularโhe was Colonel Klink on Hoganโs Heroes, but for decades, he appeared on an incredible number of major TV showsโis arguably the highlight of the episode, even though he doesnโt get too much to do. As a villain, heโs a little too ineffectual to generate much terrorโheโs a satirical figure, ultimately motivated as much by the desire to save face (and his own skin) as by the drive to powerโbut as a force to shake up a slightly sleepy episode, heโs quite nice. He switches from Klopka to Kriza via a well-composed transition sequence where โprisonerโ Klopka is escorted out of the room with Mary and confident Captain Kriza strides into an office where heโs so in charge that he gets his coat remove and his cigarette lit for him. It brings in a nice briskness and a sense of energy, and thatโs a shot in the arm this episode needs.
Even after writing all this up, though, Iโm still not sure why it needs that so badly. Every individual element, with the exception of Bergeracโs plodding performance, works well enough. But it all lacks something. The story needs more incidents. The actors need more chemistry. The suspense needs more time to build. If it were a meal, Iโd be adding salt.
The Twist: The diamonds on the watch are actually rhinestones, and Kriza decides Mary was trying to trick them into making an arrest that would be a publicity nightmare. They let her go, congratulating her on the โjoke.โ Jan then reveals to her that heโs working for the anti-communist underground. He denounced her (knowing all along that the โdiamondsโ would quickly be discovered as fakes, so sheโd be safe) to create a distraction so his own smugglingโof the last writings of an imprisoned, tortured, and murdered bishopโwould fly under the radar. The two reconcile as Mary promises to publicize the document, but despite one kiss โfor the road,โ it will be too dangerous to see each other again until the Soviet Union falls.
Eh. Like the rest of the episode, this conclusion has its bright spots. Mary gets a tart, quick-thinking rejoinder to the guard praising the presumed prank and the American sense of humor it sprang from: โWell, you know, weโre just little devils at heart.โ She doesnโt understand at this point, but she knows to keep up any pretense thatโs allowing her to go on her way. Now she gets who she’s dealing with. And I like how what initially seems like a despicable act actually stems from a peculiar chivalry: Jan explains that if he had asked her to smuggle out the tube with the documents, and her luggage had been searched despite the guardโs promises, there would have been no way to save her. He had to give her a fake risk to slightly improve the odds that he could successfully shoulder the deadly one.
But in the last minute or so, this becomes romantic suspense, and these two simply donโt have any spark. Theyโre a weak, tepid cup of tea. Maybe another pair of actors could have sold the flirtation and camaraderie and made the apparent betrayal come as a sharper shock; maybe they could have created a real sense of longing and wistfulness at the necessary farewell. Maybe then audiences of the time would have clamored to bring down the Berlin Wall just so Mary and Jan could be together again.
This is what we have, though, and all I can say, again, is that itโs fine. Itโs inoffensive. It really puts the taupe in black and white.
Directed by: Justus Aldiss
Written by: Andrew Solt1
Up Next: โPlace of Shadowsโ
About the writer
Lauren James
Lauren James is a writer who wears many different hats (and pen names). She lives in Connecticut with her wife and two cats.
Lauren Jamesโs ProfileTags for this article
More articles by Lauren James
Anthologized
Dan Duryea gets a shave and a second chance.
Anthologized
A little slice of American folklore that feels like it's been here all along.
Streaming Shuffle
You make your royal bed, and you lie in it.
Anthologized
Alone in vast space and timeless infinity: one man in a ghost town.
Department of
Conversation
Mostly agreed, although I also found it slightly absurd that Mary gets betrayed so completely by Jan and then is IMMEDIATELY satisfied by his explanation and is fully back to trusting him in seconds. Didn’t ring true to me at all and left me thinking not only “is that it?” but also “because what it was, was stupid”.
I’m willing to cut her forgiveness a little more slack because developments always have to come quickly with these kinds of time constraints (I have a harder time with her being willing to hear him out in the first place–if she’s supposed to assume there’s more to it at the point because of the rhinestones, they need to actually make that clear). But yeah, I for one would spend a lot more time dwelling on how I could have ended up in a gulag thanks to Mr. Wonderful here.
Not just Werner Klemperer but also John Banner, who played Shultz opposite Col. Klink. (Always worth noting that both men were Jewish refugees from the Nazis.) And there’s Peter Van Eyck, who turned his back on his aristocratic family to come to America, was discovered by Billy Wilder, and appeared in a number of movies, most notably Wages of Fear and The Spy Who Came in from the Cold.
I think this fits into a larger examination of Hitchcock and his use of authoritarian regimes and other threats to freedom. He was not hesitant to warn the world about such things in earlier works like The Lady Vanishes and Foreign Correspondent made before WWII and then in Lifeboat and other movies during the war. These all made for ripping suspense yarns, but fair to say he was a true believer in fighting the evils of fascism and dictatorship. And that carried over to the Cold War, but it never seems to work as well. North by Northwest is solid entertainment, but we have only the vaguest idea who the bad guys are or what they have to do with the Cold War. Torn Curtain is pretty much forgotten. And we have this, not written by Hitch but surely speaking to him, and it never comes to life. The spy thriller of the Cold War could not be the spy thriller of the Nazi era, and Hitch never worked that out, even as The Manchurian Candidate feels incredibly Hitchcockian at times.
Yeah, that’s interesting about how Hitchcock’s political engagement during and around WWII felt sharper and more relevant than his Cold War material. (North by Northwest is a favorite of mine, but it’s a romp–the politics are, as you said, a vague excuse for the plot, not a way to lend the plot substance.) I think Hitchcock could do fantastic adventure films zipped up in suspense film coats, and adventure films and WWII films have always gotten along well; the archetypal Cold War cinema is darker and grubbier and more morally compromised, and its thrills are different. Cary Grant from Notorious could be a Cold War-era agent, and that’s technically post-WWII, but it’s focused on the aftermath of WWII rather than the nascent Cold War.