Anthologized
"You don't get murdered without a reason."
This is a tense, bleak episode, easily up there with the best of the season, including the stories directed by Alfred Hitchcock himself. In fact, if you made Constance Fordโs Ellen Grant sleeker and more glamorousโand if you moved the action a bit uptownโit would feel like Hitchcock, all rising suspicion and free-floating perversion.
Itโs so good that itโs easy to miss that its structure is almost nonexistent. Itโs built like a nightmarish series of sketches, with only a few plot pointsโEllenโs relationship with her husband, Steve (Steve Brodie), proving sounder that it seemed at the start is probably the best exampleโthat really build or evolve. This is a kaleidoscopic carousel of paranoia.
The plot is simple. Itโs a hot summer evening (this is the second AHP episode to make use of this kind of broiling, temperature-stoking heat), and a killer known as the Creeper has been strangling women. Ellenโs husband works nights, so sheโs all alone. Wherever she goes, wherever she looks, she has to wonder: Are you the Creeper?
The seemingly endless possibilities are rendered vividly and with a welcome sense of the grotesque. Fittingly, everything gets worse as the night goes on and the rationality of the daylight fades away. It also moves closer to home, so we spend more time outsideโin public spaces with witnessesโearly on before moving back to a home that, far from being a safe shelter, is so incredibly violable that someoneโs already in it by the time Ellen gets back.
The cast of characters is key here, and the episode assembles a high-quality roguesโ gallery: iconic character actor Percy Helton as the affable George the Janitor, who โsmiles too muchโ; Reta Shaw as the brutally scornful neighbor Martha, giving her spite a fleshy, earthy weight; Harry Townes as Ellenโs slimy and slightly manic ex-boyfriend Ed. We could even include Steve Brodie as Steve, who starts the episode off in such a foul mood that we could see him, too, as on the edge of snapping. Later on, when heโs revealed as a mostly decent man, heโs the one who brings up how close to the surface potential violence always is: โWhy do we do it, Ed? Why do we take it out on somebody else?โ
Even as heโs grappling with that and recognizing his own potential monstrosity, he fails to recognize it in the person heโs talking to. Ellen knows who Ed isโโYou like to hurt people, donโt you? I remember how frightened I was the first time I realized thatโ–but her husband doesnโt. The man a woman sees, alone in a relationship, is different from the man another man drinks with in a bar. At the end of the episode, when weโve seen Ed break into Ellenโs apartment and manhandle and threaten her, when weโve seen him turn up the radio to hide her screams, when we know heโs the kind of man she can only safely ask to leave in front of witnesses, itโs intentionally jarring to hear Steve still talk about him like heโs a nice guy who can keep Ellen safe.
Whatโs worse is that thereโs something to it, as despicable as that is; it engages with the kind of threat evaluation calculus women are sometimes forced into. If she could know for sure that Ed wouldnโt kill her, would she keep him in the apartment after all? Would she risk an assault to possibly prevent a murder? Itโs a dark question to be forced into.
As intimately disturbing as the Ed-Ellen โreunionโ is, I wanted to highlight two performers:
The first, Alfred Linder, doesnโt even have a Wikipedia page: he only had a minor career in supporting roles, and not always in especially big productions. But heโs a key ingredient here as the shoemaker Ellen visits, and heโs maybe my favorite low-key disturbing element of the whole piece: the perfect way to embody and amp up her unease. (George does this a bit, but heโs such an obviously inappropriate Creeper candidate that he seems the likeliest red herring, which makes him more visible as a potential plot device than a shaper of the atmosphere.) Every bit of business he has is done well. I love that it starts off as entirely plausibly deniable in its creepiness. When he brings up the Creeper, is he trying to use a hot local news story to make small talk, or is he trying to juice her fear for his own entertainment? When he asks for her address, is it really to bring her husbandโs shoes by himself, or does he want to stalk her? Itโs only at the end of his scene when you get the beautifully weird bit of him tapping the card against his teeth, like heโs tasting the last bit of contact he had with her. Technically, even that could still be innocuousโitโs an understandable nervous habitโbut Linder plays it with a shudder-inducing edge.
The other supporting actor highlight is Reta Shaw. Technically, like George, sheโs particularly significant as a red herringโooh, what if the Creeper were a woman?–but her venom makes her more than that. She doesnโt need to do any actual killing to make herself felt as this visceral, malignant force; whatever else she could prove, over this half hour, she is at best a woman who takes a vicious pleasure in other womenโs misfortune. โIโve nothing to be nervous about,โ she says, savoring the news. โYou donโt get murdered without a reason.โ And thatโs before she turns on Ellen specifically, looking at Edโs departure and seeing not the aftermath of a near-rape but the aftermath of a seduction. Her willingness to allow Ellen to exist, always tentative and conditional, is redacted in a flash. Itโs hard to imagine her ever repenting of this, either: she will cuddle Ellenโs misfortune close and cherish it. Sheโs Lottie from โThe Baby Sitterโ repainted in pitch-black, unsympathetic shades.
All in all, itโs more than enough to make us understand when Ellen wilts onto her sofa:
โIโm frightened enough already.โ
โOf the Creeper?โ
โI donโt even know anymore.โ
The scariest thing isnโt that thereโs a Creeper. Itโs that anyone could be him, and that the potential for brutality is always simmering beneath the surface. The episode evokes that justifiable paranoia very well, building up a phenomenal sense of (again) nightmarish unease before finally giving us a dread-fueled climax. It may be minimalist in terms of plot, but itโs maximalist in terms of atmosphere and theme, and every performance is striking. While I singled out some of the minor players earlier, I also have nothing but praise for Constance Fordโs lead performance, too: she makes it heartbreaking to watch Ellenโs initially ordinary fright eventually fray her down until she feels like nothing but nerve endings.
The Twist: A relieved Ellen lets in the locksmith sheโs been waiting for all episode, only to find out too lateโvia a frantic Steve, who called to check in on herโthat sheโs just invited in the Creeper. He kills her while Steve listens on in horror.
Itโs a brutal, memorable, and incredibly well-staged ending. Once again, Herschel Daughertyโaided by an especially strong and thoughtful script by James Cavanaghโshows off his sense of pacing and scene construction, ratcheting up the viewerโs agony as Ellen leaves the receiver behind to open the door, letting us hear Steve when she cannot. The shot of the Creeperโs hands reaching into the frame (her frame: one last invasion of space) and wrapping around Ellen is downright chilling: perfectly composed for maximum dread. In the end, heโs not so much a specific manโif the episode has made anything clear, itโs that creeps are everywhereโbut a specific (and deadly) action, so it makes sense that he ends up disembodied. An unwanted invasion of grasping power.
Directed by: Herschel Daugherty
Written by: Joseph Ruscoll (story) & James Cavanagh (teleplay)
Up Next: โMomentumโ
About the writer
Lauren James
Lauren James is a writer who wears many different hats (and pen names). She lives in Connecticut with her wife and two cats.
Lauren Jamesโs ProfileTags for this article
More articles by Lauren James
Anthologized
Dan Duryea gets a shave and a second chance.
Anthologized
A little slice of American folklore that feels like it's been here all along.
Streaming Shuffle
You make your royal bed, and you lie in it.
Anthologized
Alone in vast space and timeless infinity: one man in a ghost town.
Department of
Conversation
Definitely an episode that achieves its goals of making every encounter filled with dread, showcasing how basically everyone in the world is despicable filth, and we should avoid human contact at all costs. It’s powerful stuff but also so relentlessly bleak that I would struggle to say I actually “enjoyed” it on any level. If this that was the bleak left turn after a run of fun episodes I might be more into it but it’s following a run of episodes that were pretty bad so I’m less tolerant of how feel-bad it is.
Not disputing its status as a great episode at all, but I think it helps illustrate my problems with the show as a whole. Also I feel bad for laughing at Hitchcock’s incredibly mean-spirited joke at the end.
I see the 80s revival re-made this one with Karen Allen in the lead, got to admit I’m a little curious about that.
I’m curious about the Karen Allen take too!
I do genuinely like this, bleak though it is, but I agree that it would hit differently and better if it were coming off a string of well-executed light episodes. There’s been an unfortunate amount of mediocrity, especially lately. We wrap up this season next week, and then I think I’ll take a couple weeks off and see how I want to handle the next stage, but it may mean season one of The Twilight Zone (which I wrote up a couple years ago, so I’ve got a lot of words on it that I can simply revisit and revise) or some hopping around to hit major highlights.
I’ve seen very little OG Twilight Zone – mostly only familiar thanks to the doomed movie and the various episodes that have been homaged / parodied, so definitely up for watching along with that!
A very well done episode. Even if we can see from early on that the killer is going to be the locksmith. Oh that creeping dread. The only false note is in the outro, and a dated sexist gag about the horror of a woman having the phone taken from her.
I was curious about whether there were any serial killers of note in the 50s, especially in NYC, and found that there was one in that era called “the Devil of Yorkville” (Yorkville being a section of the Upper East Side). I wonder if the Upper East Side setting is an echo of this in any way. Certainly this presages the breathless news coverage and absolute panic in the heat of the “Summer of Sam.”
Reta Shaw was only 43. Some people are more or less born old and stay there.
That’s really interesting about the Devil of Yorkville! I bet you’re right that the location could have been selected with an eye towards evoking a real-life counterpart. I was thinking of the Summer of Sam too.
I feel like we’ve had a couple Reta Shaw equivalents, in terms of hitting their age early and staying there; I know we’ve had a few where I’ve looked them up and been surprised they were playing “old” for decades.