The opening credits of Honey Don’t! merge the names of actors and crew into shots of Bakersfield street scenes, each getting a brief freeze frame on a drive through a down and out town. Except for one freeze frame that highlights two people who had nothing to do (directly, at least) with the movie — it’s a religious billboard highlighting the Bible verse “For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.” The citation is John 3:17, and I think more important than the text is the subtle gag of being one off from the most publicly posted Bible verse in the U.S., the sports arena staple John 3:16. That thing you know — this is similar, but not the same.
The Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke feeling is not the same as that Coen brothers feeling, and this can be hard to grapple with in Drive-Away Dolls and now Honey Don’t! Part of this is down to Coen and Cooke working a similar vein of out-of-control crime that Ethan and Joel rang changes on for four decades, people getting in over their heads in bloody and often funny fashion. But Dolls followed Margaret Qualley and Geraldine Viswanathan as a genuine buddy comedy duo, a mode the fraternal dyad has never pursued, and Honey Don’t! tracks private investigator Honey O’Donahue (Qualley again) through a twisty narrative that ultimately plays the classic tough-but-honorable-detective story straight in a way the boys never have.
That’s the only thing straight about the movie, which like DAD foregrounds Qualley’s sexuality as not just out but enthusiastically so, in particular regarding Aubrey Plaza’s reciprocating cop. Charlie Day’s detective is another story, he’s constantly hitting on Qualley despite her repeatedly stated preference for the same sex. Qualley also tells Day that she’s the best guy he knows, a backhanded compliment and entirely true statement considering the other men she comes across in the movie — her estranged and abusive father, the boyfriend abusing her niece, and Chris Evans’ exploitative and sexually domineering minister.
In another corkscrew turn, Evans’ sideline in drug dealing and its murderous fallout — and its link to a deceased, would-be client of Qualley’s — drives a good chunk of the movie while ultimately being largely a red herring. This is a bit unbalancing, because the film devotes quite a bit of time to Evans and his enthusiastic preaching of ludicrous and self-serving certainties, his domination of women and other men in his thrall, but never lets Evans go beyond shallow charisma. That may be all there is to the man though, and it’s not like that charisma is nothing — Evans gets a lot out of those wide blue eyes and his white-toothed certainty, and at one point it struck me that I’d seen something like this before. A similar self-centered charm, a belief that every decision is the right one, in Alec Baldwin’s psychopath on the loose in Miami Blues. And that locked the movie’s weird rhythm into place — it’s drawing from Charles Willeford.
The Coen brothers are cracked humanists; Ethan Coen and Trisha Cooke are viewing the world through a different lens.
Willeford wrote off-kilter crime fiction, including a series of late-80s novels about a dogged and rather degenerate detective named Hoke Moseley, with Miami Blues being adapted into the movie of the same name. (Willeford’s work has seen several movie adaptations, including Cockfighter, The Woman Chaser and The Burnt Orange Heresy.) On the surface the Moseley books are standard detective fiction — some crime happens, Hoke eventually puts a stop to it — but they are told in Willeford’s inimitable direct grotesque tone.
“Haitians, as you probably know, eat cats,” a police chief tells Hoke in The Way We Die Now, and the throughline in all of Willeford’s books is men confidently talking funny and ugly shit — “Lectures by men who think they are right,” critic Ethan Iverson describes — in the downtime between taking ugly and often not so funny actions. Violence is a fact of life, as is jockeying for position while resenting restrictions. And while Willeford’s books are well-plotted, they often move from incident to incident in a more literary mode than in genre fiction. A large chunk of Sideswipe, the third Moseley novel, has Hoke literally doing nothing in a catatonic state following a nervous breakdown; a subplot about a hare-brained petty crook exploiting a hateful old man picks up the slack.
And the other throughline here is how Willeford does not condemn or judge his men, or work to save them, but lets them speak (blithely, rudely) and act (horribly, cruelly) for themselves and leaves it to the reader to sort everything out. Some time after that lecture from the police chief, Hoke kills two men in self defense: “Both deaths were justified, of course. He had to kill the Mexican after he blinded him; blind the man wouldn’t have been able to find any work.”
What does all this have to do with a lesbian private eye in 2025 who slaps an “I Have A Vagina And I Vote!” bumper sticker over the MAGA bumper sticker of the truck belonging to the dim dipshit she just slapped around? Willeford never wrote a female protagonist that I’m aware of and his women are generally not the most well-rounded characters out there. But that is part of how his men see their world, and I think their world is what Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke are looking at in their movies. Because everyone else has to live there too.
Honey, Don’t! has a fair amount of tonal problems. An early scene with one crook mourning another is straight out of ironic 90s post-Tarantino crime and embarrassingly out of key, and the final confrontation needs some gnarly violence to cover for the wildly fluctuating emotional stakes of another person being broken down by a Willefordian world. The knock on Joel and Ethan Coen is that they that they consistently hold their characters in contempt — this is untrue; they are just consistent in side-eyeing the hubris and confidence in all of the people who populate their movies — but they have rarely been tagged with sloppiness. The Coen brothers are cracked humanists; Ethan Coen and Trisha Cooke are viewing the world through a different lens.
Charles Willeford described darkness in unadorned terms, but he was not a nihilist. Honey O’Donohue moves through a dark world with very little expectation that anything will work out beyond what she herself makes, and yet she continues her work and continues to take leaps that land in the shit. Willeford’s men constantly justify their actions, they proceed through life with the blinders that they are allowed to have (if anything, the shrugging ability to allow instability into his life is what lets Hoke Moseley be a recurring protagonist) and leave violence and death in their wake with very little regard for anything but themselves. Honey doesn’t unravel the killings Evans sets in motion with his arrogance and foolishness, and only the viewer is aware of how they play out. Evans himself is dispatched offscreen, and while Honey knows enough to call attention to a sketchy situation she still has her own blinders, ones that put her in bed with Evans’ killer. But she also acts with the knowledge that other people need her and no one else will give a shit, and she doesn’t expect any sympathy — she’s far more Lew Archer than the maudlin Philip Marlowe, but above all she’s herself.
The Bakersfield Honey moves through is a depressing place. People ride the bus and get ensnared by a cult, lovers cheat on each other and get run down in parking lots, grandmas get their throats slit by people too stupid to realize how to follow orders (Josh Pafchek is a dunce for the ages in this regard; longtime Coen casting director Ellen Chenoweth stays winning). It’s a Willeford kind of place, and yet people his men never considered are planting their feet in it. Honey is saving the world on no one’s terms but her own, and those terms absolutely include some heavy petting at the bar. So many of the Coens’ movies can be boiled down to a question repeated in The Man Who Wasn’t There: “What kind of a man are you?” In Honey Don’t, Qualley has the same answer whenever a man makes a pass: “I like girls.” And if she exactly doesn’t like where she is, she’s not going anywhere.
Tags for this article
More articles by Dave Shutton
The Friday Article Roundup
There's still time to experience the best pop culture writing of the week.
Double Features
Family heirlooms loom large in Father Mother Sister Brother and Vulcanizadora.
Double Features
Moving in time with One Battle After Another and Caught By The Tides.
Department of
Conversation
Year of the Month update!
This September, we’re covering these movies, albums, books, from 1938!
TBD: Cori Domschot: Bringing Up Baby/Holiday
Sept. 15th: Bridgett Taylor: Rebecca
And here’s a primer on some of the movies, albums, books and TVwe’ll be covering for 1973 in October!
Oct. 7th: Lauren James: Working
Oct. 22nd: Lauren James: The Wicker Man
Oct. 29th: Lauren James: Don’t Look Now
Good work! I similarly liked how the couple in Love Lies Bleeding are in a scummy noir universe while still owning their often tricky identities (“I like…both”).
Thanks! LLB’s shift into fantasy/magical realism works well at the end, I think because it is immediately followed by Stewart having to deal with more regular real shit (those bodies won’t dispose of themselves); Honey Don’t is all regular real shit and is darker in its ending.
Coming out of exile to say this is a great piece for a troublesome but very intriguing movie. As much as this isn’t a Coen brothers movie, it very much isn’t Drive-Away Dykes 2 either, and I was as thrown as anybody by how violently it rejects expectations of another goofy, gay adventure (Tricia’s said the final film in the lesbian trilogy is Nicolas Roeg-inspired horror). Dykes, for its thematically appropriate loosey-goosiness, aims for straightforward rom-com and wraps up as neatly and happily as that genre demands, even with the political storm clouds in the distance. The much-called-for “lesbian movie with a happy ending where they don’t die”, while Honey Don’t! refuses any such sugarcoating for the never-to-be-resolved realities of being queer in the present; your parents fucked you up, your partner’s parents fucked her up beyond repair, everybody on the outside is fucking everybody else up, and even being the cool lesbian aunt is a dangerous position. It can’t all come close to being fixed, but even still the end reveal is a big miscalculation in how exactly it leaves things unresolved, performed and paced like Tricia and Ethan had to fast-forward to fit into the b-movie frame what they want to say. I vibed with the movie more when I saw it a second time (a group of college-aged girls in that second audience had a great time which is a funny way to experience something so deliberately off-putting), yet the ending somehow clarified less on rewatch. At least it ends with its best feature, Margaret Qualley facial acting saying a lot a lot more subtly than expected after her cartoon Texan. Honey is the hero of our time, a good heart prone to wallow in justified cynicism and make fatal mistakes (the final shot into the title song drop says it all), one whose uphill battle Tricia and Ethan respect but can no longer pretend exists in a comic bubble.
Hey, really great to see you! And I had a bunch of college-aged girls at my screening too, they enjoyed it but seemed pretty baffled by the abrupt ending, which is very fair.
“the end reveal is a big miscalculation in how exactly it leaves things unresolved, performed and paced like Tricia and Ethan had to fast-forward to fit into the b-movie frame what they want to say” — bingo. It’s odd to say a more conventional approach would help, but the reveal really makes you appreciate the kind of straightforward seeding of a background gone bad that is par for the course in this kind of thing, it’s just not there enough as it is. It would be easy enough to add in but that would expand the frame, so the option is to cut down on the Evans stuff and that messes with the larger Willefordian vibe I think. The other factor is that Joel’s hand behind the camera is missed, nothing is bad here but there are opportunities for cinematic storytelling (that could be useful in revealing info!) that are missed.
And while that ending is not a good sign for Honey, I took her resourcefulness in getting out of the climax’ jam as an indicator she can get out of this one. But maybe not…
Great to see you too! For the record, I absolutely want to believe Honey will make it out of this next jam, hopefully closer to unscathed than the last time. Qualley’s close-up acting in other movies is often transcendentally goofy, but as Honey she sells the quiet smarts of a classic movie PI and threads them with moments of deep passion and crushing weakness, which of course end up the same thing by the end. She’s a natural movie star who gets shot down to Earth as brutally as any of us; her hard-boiled quips in the scene with her dad don’t change but her eyes betray the heartbroken little girl this piece of shit left behind with scars that don’t heal. That final smile contains all of that, the promise of wide-eyed lust, “here we go again!” detective hijinks, and dangerous/irresponsible instincts. Both this and Dykes come down hard on “you shouldn’t date cops”, maybe this is a happy ending because at least it’s a push in that direction.
I was definitely impressed by how well Qualley hit those classic PI notes and those “quiet smarts” — the stuff with her and her sister, where Qualley takes in things she’s been taking in for a long time and doesn’t act but is ready to, was really good, her quiet confidence goes a long way. (And Coens-wise, interesting to see that double wide as a cousin to Hi and Ed’s trashed home in Raising Arizona, after those little monsters run amok in it.)