Close Search Close

 

  • Comics
  • Theatre
  • Site News

The Friday Article Roundup

The FAR has selected: Regicide

No kings, of pop or otherwise, just the best pop culture writing of the week

This week, you will dethrone:

  • An evil biopic
  • Animals adapted badly
  • State lies
  • Assumptions about musical memoir
  • Expectations about narrative
  • Hierarchies of singer and subject

Send articles throughout the next week to magpiesmedia [at] gmail, post articles from the past week below for discussion and Have a Happy Friday!


Israel Daramola eviscerates Michael and its bad faith myth-making for Defector:
Many movies are bad. Sometimes badness is fun, but oftentimes it’s pretty boring. I could in theory deal with simple badness of Michael the same way I dealt with the badness of so many biopics that have come out the post-Bohemian Rhapsody music IP gold rushโ€”laughing at the sorry attempts to sand the edges off of famously jagged stars, enjoying the singalong bits, and mostly just not really caring about these movies one way or the other. But significant portions of Michael are dedicated to Jackson’s love for his child fans, at which point the movie goes from not just bad but actively evil.

At The AV Club, Kayleigh Donaldson surveys the shoddy field of Animal Farm adaptations:
This ending [of the 1999 adaptation] is far more cowardly than that of the [1954] Halas and Batchelor version. At least in that one, the animals got to lead the change. Here, the message seems to be that the best thing to do is to wait for the fascists to tire themselves out or fall prey to their own stupidity. Then the animals can find nicer, more understanding humans and work with them for a happy ending. Who knew it was possible to do both-sides centrism with a George Orwell story?

For Metrograph, Nick Pinkerton interviews Lucrecia Martel about pushing back on state narratives:
So, allegedly, in a trial, what you do is search for the truth. Allegedly. But Argentinian history, this is something that was imposed upon us. So the search for truth canโ€™t ever be an intelligent search. What cinema can do, though, is reveal how truth is fabricated. In this way, cinema is very powerful. Not just [because it can] tell a counternarrative, a narrative that is counter to the official history, but because it is able to reveal how truth is fabricated.

Philip Freeman considers at jazz (and former Rollins Band) bassist Melvin Gibbs’ new book, How Black Music Took Over The World:
What Gibbs offers is a mixture of autobiography; professional memoir; technical discussion of musical practice, and the specific characteristics of African and Caribbean musical forms which manifest in American music; physics, theoretical and otherwise; and cultural history. It bounces around a lot, taking you from almost textbook-style studies of musical patterns (including diagrams of Gibbsโ€™ own design, to help readers like me who love music but canโ€™t perform it to save our lives) to tales from the road to family lore and back around again.

At Letterboxd, Isaac Feldberg interviews Kiyoshi Kurosawa about his films’ unsettling endings:
Perhaps it is a little irresponsible for me to say this, but I do feel that there is no need for a film to have a very clear conclusion. In fact, I find it strange for a film to have that. Of course, what I am creating is fiction, but I think what a film is able to do is to say to an audience, โ€œThis kind of person exists, and this kind of person did these kinds of things. What do you think?โ€

And for Hearing Things, Andy Cush profiles folk singer Frank Hurricane as a bard of the people:
Think about Walt Whitman, โ€œI Hear America Singingโ€โ€”the regular sorts of people Whitman celebrated, whom few poets before him had considered worthy of tribute in verse: the mechanic, the shoemaker. Fast forward 166 years to the decaying America we live in today and you may begin to get a sense of Frank Hurricaneโ€™s subjects. He hears the vape store employee singing, and the nitrous fiend in the music festival parking lot.