Close Search Close

 

  • Comics
  • Theatre
  • Site News

Stargate: Universe

Some thoughts on creative riffing.

Stargate: Universe is the least popular entry in the Stargate television franchise that spun off from the movie of the same name. It was criticized at the time specifically for being too much of an imitation of the then-popular Battlestar Galactica remake spearheaded by Ron Moore; edgy violence, political storytelling, and interpersonal drama. None of these things were completely out of the blue for Stargate but they were presented with both an intensity that mismatched previous entries in the franchise and, more crucially, insincerity. Abigail Nussbaum wrote well about how S:U was actually quite late in the game in catching up with the cool kids; audiences could feel the sweaty desperation to be taken seriously and turned away.

One of my projects the last half-decade has been visiting scifi American TV of the 90’s that I either hadn’t seen since I was a kid or had never seen at all, and the most unexpected outcome was coming to appreciate how S:U happened. Stargate: SG-1 premiered in 1997, when I was six years old; I came to it knowing only really knowing Star Trek: TNG and Star Wars. In actuality, it was a blend of every popular speculative fiction show at the time. Its premise and main character dynamic lifting, obviously, from Star Trek; its cinematic style and government conspiracy subplots lifting from The X-Files; its longform intergalactic political plotting lifting from Babylon 5 and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.

(I’m also fairly certain the mythological aspect of the Goa’uld and local cultures is lifted directly from Xena: Warrior Princess, but I haven’t watched that yet)

Stargate: SG-1 shows the principle that if you steal from one person, it’s plagiarism, and if you steal from everybody, it’s research. Because no one influence beyond the film dominates the writing, a unique tone and morality emerges; because every single technique in it is a proven successful quantity, it’s a functional story. I question its lack of ambition but I don’t question the process. It actually seems quite sensible – these are a bunch of different ideas we know people respond to, so let’s put them in a blender and see what comes out.

What really struck me is how many of the shows that clearly influenced SG-1 were still on the air and, indeed, still in their prime when it premiered. The X-Files was at its absolute cultural dominance; Deep Space Nine was deep into what’s widely considered its best years, with Worf entering the cast and the Dominion Wars; Babylon 5 was finishing up the main arc, paying off years of work; Star Trek: TNG had been off the air a few years finishing an absolutely iconic, genre-defining run. In this context, Stargate is a kind of reliable workhorse; if TNG, Babylon 5 and The X-Files were pioneers, and Deep Space Nine was building a new city on that path, Stargate: SG-1 was someone taking a job in that city.

From this perspective, it completely makes sense why they’d try to rip from whatever’s popular for their new series. It’s almost like the third act decision from the tragic hero, where they do what has worked for them up until now in a completely incorrect context. Hey, using popular techniques led to us creating a widely beloved, iconic television show that lasted a decade – why not do it again? There were two problems, however. The first is that they didn’t fully understand the techniques they were using; I criticize Ron Moore’s take on Battlestar Galactica for its hypocritical commitment to a status quo, but it took a season and a half for that to become a problem, not three episodes, and whatever you say about the characters and their stolid development, all of them are immediately and vividly charming and compelling.

The second is that this one idea was dominating the whole work, making the influence blatantly obvious in a way that wasn’t quite true before. Like I said, steal from one person and it’s plagiarism. It turned all the creative decisions into artifice; purity of heart and good intentions absolutely matters for art, because audiences can pick your intentions in a heartbeat even if they can’t quite put words to that. If you’re here to put the human condition to a stunning melodrama that asks the big questions, that’s what they’ll see; if you’re here to fill time, they’ll notice that too.

This is interesting because, at time of writing, I’ve just finished my first book and it’s lifting pretty heavily from the premise of Stargate. I hope to hell it’s not actually plagiarism; I didn’t lift any of the characters, my villains are quite different from the Goa’uld, Ori, and Wraiths, and I only stole one episode’s plot. Hell, I don’t even have a Stargate – I took that out on the basis that Stargate so thoroughly owns the concept that I could never live up to it. I hope that I lift from Stargate the way Stargate lifted The X-Files and Star Trek and Babylon 5 and so on. I know my intentions are pure, and that I’m trying to put the human condition etc etc.