Close Search Close

 

  • Comics
  • Theatre
  • Site News

The Friday Article Roundup

The FAR is getting hot and bothered

Get uncomfortably aroused with the best pop culture writing of the week.

This week, you will feel the heat of:

  • Hockey hopes
  • Hockey hypocrisy
  • Hardcore leanings
  • Hell and other bad words
  • Hard dyings, ranks
  • Hookers in Minneapolis

Hot stuff contributed by C.D. Ploughman and Bridgett Taylor! Send articles throughout the next week to magpiesmedia [at] gmail, post articles from the past week below for discussion and Have a Happy Friday!


Eva Holland writes at Defector about how the Heated Rivalry books and TV show have brought hockey back in her life:
Instead of being a bummer, the engagement with hockeyโ€™s dark side(s) in [author Rachel] Reidโ€™s romances offered me a kind of unexpected solace. Thereโ€™s something soothing and hopeful about watching Reidโ€™s characters struggle to create space to be themselves. To take care of themselves and each other, to break down barriers and demand acceptance, and to hold their teammates to account. The series is a specific sort of wish fulfillmentโ€”that there could be a better NHL, a better reality for hockey players and fansโ€”but in granting that wish, Reidโ€™s books helped remind me why I had it in the first place.

While Frankie de la Cretaz is not buying the NHL’s co-opting of the Heated Rivalry show:
NHL ratings and viewership has been plummeting for a while….If [the league] wanted to appeal to a wider audience in order to grow the sport, they could have done so long before a TV show made it impossible for them not to. But theyโ€™re cowards who feared that speaking up for LGBTQ+ people would cost them their audience, while ironically failing to realize that it might have actually grown it. This audience has been here the whole time, but the league has shown absolutely no interest in appealing to it at all.

Eli Enis interviews Karly Hartzman of Wednesday about her musical past and her journey into hardcore:
It’s just not something I ever connected with at the time when I should have, so I’m kind of just trying to go back and rebuild at least a little foundation if I’m going to be influenced by that music at all [going forward]. Itโ€™s more fun to play a higher energy show, because I kind of want to make music that caters to that. I don’t want to get more singer-songwritery. I kind of want to just curate a space for people to go nuts at a show.

For the New York Times, Julia Jacobs examines the MPAA rules against the F-word in movies, with its impact being defended by august men of letters like Tony Kushner and the guy who directed Billy Madison:
Screenwriters bat around ideas in competition for the funniest or most dramatic deployment. Actors angle to be the one to say it; fans delight in tracking it. In test screenings, filmmakers note which utterance gets the biggest laugh. โ€œYou typically have a handful of options and then you pick the horse you want to ride to the finish line,โ€ said Rawson Marshall Thurber, the director of โ€œDodgeballโ€ and other PG-13 comedies.

For Time Out, Die Hard scribe Stephen E de Souza gives his definitive ranking of films in the Die Hard in a X” genre, including Passenger 57:
One of the earliest entries, and one of the best: Unlike Bruce Willisโ€™ โ€˜wrong guy in the wrong placeโ€™, Wesley Snipesโ€™ airline security expert hero is a little-too-on-the-nose for an airline emergency, and the British villain (a bemulleted Bruce Payne) a little-too-on-the-Hans-Gruber-nose as an opponent, but the greatly compressed field of combat and time frame โ€“ 1200 square feet of airplane versus 34 floors of office building, and five hours of flight versus Die Hardโ€™s overnight siege โ€“ adds enough tension to mitigate these minor deviations from the model. ย If only the awesome, gripping and astonishingly profound Die Hard 2: Die Harder hadnโ€™t done the airplane thing first.

And in a new translation for Mubi by Jawni Han, Park Chan-wook extols Tom Waits and “Christmas Card From A Hooker In Minneapolis”:
Yes, the songโ€™s inert, umami-flavored piano is incredible. But what really steals the show is the lyrics. The words that Tom sings, I mean, โ€œharps on,โ€ are set to a pretty monotonous melody, but this simplicity moves me greatly. The lyrics describe the desperate lives of pathetic losers, and the song is more beautiful than any melodrama I know. What even needs to be said? If I were an American director, I would make an eponymous movie based on the songโ€™s lyrics in a heartbeat.