Close Search Close

 

  • Comics
  • Theatre
  • Site News

The Friday Article Roundup

The FAR Is Looking Up

Positivity and cynicism battle it out in today's roundup of interesting pop culture writing from around the web.

Will optimism win the day at the FAR? Let’s measure:

  • Video Essays (half full)
  • Rap Battles (half empty)
  • New Movies (half full)
  • AI Muzak (half empty)
  • Optimistic Philosophy (half full)

Thanks to contributions by Dave Shutton and Cori Domschot to make our cup overfloweth. Send articles throughout the next week to ploughmanplods [at] gmail, post articles from the past week below for discussion, and Have a Happy Friday!


For Reverse Shot, Dan Schindel looks at the growth in video essays over the past 25 years and what they can reveal:

Video essays can also dissect the relationship that media builds between people and familiar spaces … One of the archetypal examples of how formal playfulness can translate to online virality, LJ Frezzaโ€™s Nothing (2014) is a supercut of shots from Seinfeld, famously โ€œabout nothing,โ€ which contain no human beings. In the absence of the actors whose scheming and collisions animate the sitcom, the essay draws out the sets that usually recede from the viewerโ€™s attention, encouraging them to notice the subliminal details of production design that flesh out this world. It takes a lot of effort to make a long-running series about nothing.

At Letterboxd, Robert Daniels interviews RaMell Ross about developing his voice and the visual style of Nickel Boys:

RD: That image making, of course, creates opportunities to flip the perceived meaning of images, too. Iโ€™m thinking about the lunchroom scene where we begin half of it from Elwoodโ€™s perspective, and then you replay the scene from Turnerโ€™s perspective. That moment of inversion isnโ€™t in the book. Why that instance to turn the audience on their head, so to speak?

RR: There are a couple of reasons. We know that shooting a film from one point of view comes with some baggage. Not being able to see the character does affect the way you experience a narrative. Thatโ€™s goodโ€”we need to keep exploring other modes of connecting with narrative and characters. But at the same time, we didnโ€™t want to deprive the audience of seeing him. Itโ€™s also such a beautiful idea. When Joslyn [Barnes] and I were talking through what point of view would mean, to have only Turner see him, well, being able to see someone is almost a philosophical and spiritual feat. But in that moment in time in the narrative, youโ€™re almost a little like: โ€˜I know what the filmโ€™s gonna be.โ€™

At Public Books, Austin McCoy delves into the history of rap battles and concludes the only real winners are labels and suits often at the expense of art and audiences:

Yet, amid the flood of discourse about the meaning of Drake and Lamarโ€™s beef, precious few commentators have interrogated the rap beef as a form of capitalist accumulation, one that enriches artistsโ€”and, most of all, the corporate suits that run their record labelsโ€”even as it drags their reputations through the mud. Artists engage in cutthroat competition, in other words, not only to garner support from fans or square up over long-festering rivalries, but also to increase market share.

Liz Pelly previews her upcoming book about Spotify in Harper’s with a look at how the company created “Perfect Fit Content,” commissioned Muzak designed to replace royalty-requiring songs:

Eventually, it became clear internally that many of the playlist editorsโ€”whom Spotify had touted in the press as music lovers with encyclopedic knowledgeโ€”were uninterested in participating in the scheme. The company started to bring on editors who seemed less bothered by the PFC model. These new editors looked after mood and activity playlists, and worked on playlists and programs that other editors didnโ€™t want to take part in anymore. (Spotify denies that staffers were encouraged to add PFC to playlists, and that playlist editors were discontented with the program.) By 2023, several hundred playlists were being monitored by the team responsible for PFC. Over 150 of these, including โ€œAmbient Relaxation,โ€ โ€œDeep Focus,โ€ โ€œ100% Lounge,โ€ โ€œBossa Nova Dinner,โ€ โ€œCocktail Jazz,โ€ โ€œDeep Sleep,โ€ โ€œMorning Stretch,โ€ and โ€œDetox,โ€ were nearly entirely made up of PFC.

The Guardian‘s Huw Green reviews a new book by Sumit Paul that studies optimism without getting weird about it:

The risk of a book called The Bright Side is that it evokes the farcical good cheer of Eric Idleโ€™s character at the close of The Life of Brian, leading a trivial little sing song among a group of people who have been crucified. This is always a problem when seeking to promote optimism in the face of significant geopolitical and ethical challenges. It can seem perverse, amid ongoing suffering and uncertainty, to maintain that things will go well. Paul-Choudhury is a science journalist and a man who has borne the premature loss of his wife to ovarian cancer. He is serious about optimism, but he is never glib or Pollyannaish. His book is as much a careful examination of the misuses of optimism as its uses. Here ideas are picked up, explored, and critiqued. Different perspectives are presented, and what unfolds is a convincing case that, while we might frequently feel we have grounds for pessimism, a particular form of optimism is the only morally serious choice.

And last but not least, as is his annual tradition Indiewire critic David Ehrlich has made a video countdown of his 25 favorite films of the year and ties it to a fundraiser suggested by a director of one of those films. Click here to go to his GoFundMe page where you can see his video and donate to the Red Crescent Society.