Close Search Close

 

  • Comics
  • Theatre
  • Site News

Year Of The Month

Throne of Blood

Toshiro Mifune. Isuzu Yamada. One of the greatest tragedies ever written. What else is there to say?

Despite being a different language, a different setting, and a different set of characters, Akira Kurosawa’s Throne of Blood may be my favourite iteration of Macbeth. The interesting thing about William Shakespeare’s plays is that, as complicated as the dialogue and often the plotting is, the action itself is always very simple (even if you have situations such as the protagonist getting captured by pirates offscreen). Puns, cultural references, politics; these things can evaporate as soon as you try to translate them. Killing your boss to take his job on the advice of your partner is something that anyone can grasp. Lady Macca is everyone’s favourite female Shakespeare character; written by a man in a world where women were property, and yet a self-actualized working woman of 2026 who ironically throws around ‘girlboss’ as a term of endearment finds something to relate to in her quest for power that crumbles when guilt hits her.

The two leads are a large reason why. Nobody in this world can show a shift from zero to one hundred as well as Toshiro Mifune; it isn’t just that you believe that this man can suddenly access this volcanic rage at the drop of a hat, but that you want to go on that journey with him. He isn’t just emotionally hysterical, it’s joyful to empathize with his hysteria; anyone can be emotionally unstable, but Mifune conveys the glee of giving into your feelings. Of course, this also means he’s excellent at conveying lack of emotion – coolness, both in the colloquial phrase intended to convey a detached above-it-all charm, and in the sense of being calculating and level-headed.

Mifune’s intense emotions aren’t as vivid in Throne of Blood as they are in The Seven Samurai, where Kukuchiyo is a bratty child who develops into a cunning warrior; nor is he nearly as cool as in Yojimbo, where the nameless-and-yet-eponymous character is ruthlessly cutting up two crime syndicates. Instead, it’s an artful blend of the two, one that shows the role of Macbeth (or, fine, Washizu) requires these seemingly contradictory sides. His seeming coolheadedness descends into vivid, bloodthirsty emotion. Perhaps that’s all there ever was to him.

I am equally enthralled by Isuzu Yamada as Asaji (or Lady Macbeth, if you prefer). The interesting thing about the scheming woman behind the throne using her feminine wiles to manipulate men is that she seems to be almost entirely the product of men. Women, in my experience, write their protagonists to be just as active as men; most people prefer to act upon rather than be passive-aggressive. I’m not saying this about Lady Maccers in particular, but when men write characters like that, they tend to project their own insecurities onto her – if not what they would literally do as women, or projecting their own fragilities and weaknesses onto women, then at least recycling old hurts they’ve endured (or perhaps rewritten in memory).

Chiaki manages to embody what Lady Maccers represents: ambition that disintegrates in face of the reality. If Macbeth is the dual relationship between emotion and reason, Lady Macbeth is the relationship between ambition and humanity. Chiaki projects not emotion, nor even reason, but power. Her eyes themselves show that what she sees isn’t the object in front of her, but the goal she’s pursuing. Her arc is a process of corruption; her very body seems to corrode before our eyes as the guilt overruns her. We all like to think of ourselves as rational, as ahead of everyone else, or that we’d cut up our enemies without a second thought and move on. The truth is that most of us are, if not weak, then at least less able to dehumanize either ourselves or others than we’d like to believe (it’s very hard for a human to do things that aren’t human).

Really, that’s the dual points of the story. Macbeth kills because it’s too easy; Lady Macbeth dies because it’s too hard. These points hang over many Kurosawa films; I think particularly of Stray Dog, where Mifune’s character is eager to dehumanize the killer and make himself a hero and Takashi Shimura takes great glee in cutting him down, knowing how exhausting that approach can be. Perhaps he’s simply too familiar with Macbeth, knowing how it ended.

Want to support more great writing like this? Get exclusive member benefits like access to our Discord, early access to Media Magpies content, and more by joining our Patreon!