Close Search Close

 

  • Comics
  • Theatre
  • Site News

“What in God’s name are you blathering about?”

Hawkeye Pierce talks about nothing.

In season five, episode twenty of M*A*S*H, there is a short scene in which Hawkeye contemplates the foot. This has always stuck with me specifically because not only does it have nothing to do with the plot of the episode, it’s an abstraction so inane that it’s effectively nothing. He’s not talking about the War, or analysing the character of people around him, or even really talking about medicine – he’s just saying the foot is neat. This does speak to Hawkeye’s character – he’s very intelligent, easily bored, and loves the sound of his own voice, so when completely at rest, he’ll analyse the most minute thing around him, even if it means analysing the foot.

This has become a very strong influence on my fiction writing. TV Tropes refers to this kind of scene as a Seinfeldian Conversation, because that show popularised the idea of sitcom characters having analytical conversations about inane topics; around the same time, the films of Quentin Tarantino and Kevin Smith brought the idea of pop culture analysis into genre works. Even by the standards of these three works, a meditation on feet (something Tarantino only does visually) is a bit extreme.

What I’ve found with big writing projects is that it really is about the generation of a lot of text. That’s a fairly unromantic take on the process of writing, but it’s a necessary and helpful one; a small project like a short story, a comic strip, or a pop culture essay has its own difficulties, but none of them come from having to ask “what will I write about next?” because that’s the start of the process. For example, this week’s essay was originally going to be about Jordan Peele before I realised my premise was wrong, tossed it aside, and decided “I’m going to write about the foot scene from M*A*S*H”, and now the whole thing is flowing pretty easily.

With a longer work, one is constantly assaulted by the question of what to write about next; for reasons of pacing, plotting, even character (there are options you know you have that the character wouldn’t take), one can find oneself blocked. Character is the essential forward element of any story (usually, one is more likely to know what a character would do than what they wouldn’t), genre is extremely helpful too – you write a crime story, you have a list of crimes of punishments at the handy. 

But I’ve also found having characters verbalize my brainstorming or analysis a la Hawkeye tends to solve two problems at once – the characters solve the plot problem in the moment, and I have upped the wordcount of my writing. It’s essentially putting what would otherwise be notes in the mouths of the characters, and from the perspective of the audience, they’re seeing a character perform an action. Very rarely is it ever as abstract as Hawkeye’s foot preoccupation, but it’s the same principle. It helps when you’re writing to get somewhere as opposed to start somewhere – when your writing aims to provoke more writing; within this scene alone, Hawkeye’s blathering leads to an incredibly funny pair of lines:

“Alright, you sold me. I’ll take a pair in my size.”
“There are none in your size.”